Forensic Interviews of Children: the Components of Scientific Validity and Legal Admissibility

نویسنده

  • NANCY E. WALKER
چکیده

The problems associated with assessments of children’s reports of victimization in criminal proceedings came to national attention during the 1980s and 1990s in a series of highly publicized trials of daycare staff. In the McMartin Preschool case, more than 350 children claimed to have been molested at the preschool and a number of public locations including a market, a car wash, and a church. During interviewing, some children reported that, in addition to experiencing sexual abuse, they had been taken on plane rides and forced to drink blood and to watch animals being mutilated. Prosecutors said that the suggestive techniques used to elicit retrospective reports from such young children were appropriate, whereas the defense claimed that the interviewing and videotaping procedures were inept. When the trial ended in January of 1990, several jurors reported that they believed some of the children had in fact been molested but that the state had failed to prove the identity of the perpetrator(s).

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

LTDNA Evidence on Trial

Adopting the interpretative/hermeneutical method typical of much legal scholarship, this article considers two sets of issues pertaining to LTDNA profiles as evidence in criminal proceedings. The section titled Expert Evidence as Forensic Epistemic Warrant addresses some rather large questions about the epistemic status and probative value of expert testimony in general. It sketches a theoretic...

متن کامل

The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science.

Converging legal and scientific forces are pushing the traditional forensic identification sciences toward fundamental change. The assumption of discernible uniqueness that resides at the core of these fields is weakened by evidence of errors in proficiency testing and in actual cases. Changes in the law pertaining to the admissibility of expert evidence in court, together with the emergence of...

متن کامل

Explaining Factors Related to the Implementation of Legal Medicine Organization Policies based on the Islamic Value System with Presenting a Desirable Model

Abstract The purpose of this article is to present the model of factors related to the implementation of forensic medicine policies in the country based on the Islamic value system. The present study is descriptive and correlational, which was conducted by survey method. The statistical population of the study includes a group of experts who were selected as 15 people as Delphi and snowballs,...

متن کامل

Relating Admissibility Standards for Digital Evidence to Attack Scenario Reconstruction

Attackers tend to use complex techniques such as combining multi-step, multi-stage attack with anti-forensic tools to make it difficult to find incriminating evidence and reconstruct attack scenarios that can stand up to the expected level of evidence admissibility in a court of law. As a solution, we propose to integrate the legal aspects of evidence correlation into a Prolog based reasoner to...

متن کامل

The Association of Firearm and Tool Mark Examiners (AFTE) December 23, 2015 response to seven questions related to forensic science posed on November 30, 2015 by The President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST):

The Scientific Working Group for Firearm and Toolmarks (SWGGUN) developed the Admissibility Resource Kit (ARK) in 2005 to assist forensic firearm and tool mark examiners in the preparation for evidence admissibility hearings. When the SWGGUN was defunded in 2013, the AFTE Board of Directors and the past SWGGUN members decided to republish and maintain the ARK on the AFTE website. The ARK contai...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2001